Going Raw

on Monday, August 1, 2011 at 6:04pm

Ok...Two weeks ago today, I got fired up and decided to change my life. I want my next 50 years to be productive, I want to be healthier, I want to be leaner, I want to get up the hills faster, and so I made a drastic change. Mostly Raw Veganism.

What is so drastic is that I am staying away from macro nutrient foods and going for the micro nutrient foods. Unfortunately meat and potatoes are macro. These are foods with lots of stored energy and low nutrition. It seems a rule of nature is that high calorie and high nutrition don't coexist so not only are most people getting fatter but they are also becoming malnourished which compounds poor health, disease and early death.

Why raw? The body needs nutrients, enzymes, and minerals. Heat breaks down nutrients and enzymes. It's pretty simple. A cooked or canned vegetable has lost 80-90% of it's nutrition. Why unprocessed food? It's quite apparent that once a food manufacturer gets involved there is not only the loss of nutrients from the processing but there's going to be a lot chemicals and fillers added. So if it's processed, it's not going in.

It took 2 weeks for my body to adapt to raw vegan. The adaptation is getting used to the drastic reduction in calories. First week of this journey was juice. I will say, I have had a little bit of salmon and tuna but only maybe 12-14oz in those 2 weeks. I can see myself eating cooked "rare" beef in small amounts in a few months.

What? Yes I said beef. My goal isn't 100% raw vegan but maybe 80-90% because when I start back to riding heavily I am going to need some calories so I will add back complex carbohydrates too.

The helpful things a person needs to do this are a heavy duty blender(at minimum 600watts or you are gonna burn one up). Commercial grades are over 1000 watts. Yep, smoothies are great. I have found that almond milk and/or carrot juice does well as a base for blending veggies. If you aren't great with the knife and cutting board a food processor makes the job quick.

The changes so far are the obvious weight loss, my heat tolerance is up also. My theory on that is my body isn't creating additional heat by processing calories for storage or for energy. There's also the obvious benefits of a high natural fiber diet. Another side effect is that I am not feeling like I want more than one cup of coffee in the morning which is completely unintended because I love coffee. My mind feels clearer though sometimes I can get into a mental fog with the low blood sugar and there is the occasional crankiness.

As far as riding, I have to manage my limited energy so I am just getting enough riding in so that I don't have to readapt to the saddle and crankset once I get back on. I will probably adapt to the lower calories some more so hopefully I can get my activity up so that I can burn more calories than I am now. My intention is to maintain this calorie level till mid or end of September and the epic adventure rides will begin in October.

The NFL, Cars, and Cyclists


The current situation of traffic accidents and vulnerable vehicles(cyclists, runners, motorcycles, light energy efficient vehicles) relates to the same dilemma that the NFL is having with it's increase of brain progressive damage. The NFL thought it was solving it's problems by "improving" it's helmet design and padding. The result was the increase in brain trauma. NFL players got faster, bigger, and stronger and the impacts got more severe. I remember as a high school football player when I got my neck roll pad, I became a lot more aggressive and reckless with my hitting because it made me feel more protected. What the NFL has found out that they now need to change the rules of the game to reduce brain trauma. So now we as a society need to change the rules of the game when it comes to reducing automobile accidents.

The progressive damage that we are seeing with cars and accidents is that we have felt that by making cars more impact resistant we reduce the chance of damage. The result is the increase in costs of automobiles, the increase in cost of repairs and even more worse, the perception of invulnerability by today's drivers. The whole notion of invulnerability is the disease that needs to be addressed. The rules that we need to change are the ones that target the behavior of motorists by removing their distractions, provide a cost for ignoring established rules of the road, education and verification of one's competence behind the wheel.

Today the driver is distracted more than ever by cell phones and pdas. Texting increases the risk of an accident by 23 times, and talking on a cell phone 4 times. Drivers are more prone to riskier behaviors as they feel a sense of invulnerability provided them by the protection and power of their vehicles. A person is only required once in their lifetime to prove that they are competent to drive a vehicle, but consider a vehicle that weighs 3200lbs going 30 mph has 98,000 ft lbs of energy. It is one of the most deadly machines ever created and there is no system in place to remove incompetent drivers from the road.

Today most traffic accidents are not investigated by law enforcement unless they result in a death or severe injuries. Law enforcement has relegated traffic accidents up to insurance companies. Instead of identifying behaviors that result in accidents and targeting them with fines or penalties,and punishing those who practice them, those drivers are now "protected" from the consequences of bad behavior by the "protection" of insurance. I personally was hit 3 times in a short period of time by other drivers all who were breaking some law and not a single citation was issued. No citation was issued when I was hit while riding my bike by a motorist who failed to yield the right of way as he entered the roadway. This inaction has added to the progressive erosion of drivers true liability and their attitude to more vulnerable users of the roadways.

The laws that we need to target should be specific for reducing the progressive reduction of drivers responsibilities.

Rich

The standards that motorists should be held to have their car under control need to be addressed.

When I get on my bike and get on a roadway I assume that my life could be taken away by a motorist but by assuming that risk I do not absolve the motorist from his obligation to have his car "under control", neither should our govt.

It's quite obvious why a car should be required to be under control to the utmost ability of that driver. The physics dictate that a car in motion is a very dangerous situation. Here is a link that shows the forces of a 3,200 lb car. The energy behind a 3,200 lb car at 30 mph is over 98,ooo ft lbs. That is huge for a car on car and even more deadly on a more vunerable user of the roadway such as a pedestrian, cyclist, motorcyclist, or lighter energy efficient cars.

For this post I want to talk about an essential element of control and that is avoiding the distraction of using communication devices such as a cell phone or pda. It's quite obvious that today there are more distractions for motorists and the number one distraction today is the use of communication devices while driving. Society has become very lax as we don't want to give up our use of cell phones as we drive. It's a pretty selfish reason that results in loss of life and loss of money. The result is that we are even more dangerous than ever now. The statistics of texting and driving can me found here. The result is 23 times more likely to be involved in an accident while texting. Talking on a phone is also a distraction and increases the likely hood of an accident by 4 times.

Faced with the realities of the physics of a car in motion and the potential for disaster it is quite clear that while you are engaging in either texting or talking on a cell phone and driving an automobile, you do not have your car under control to your utmost ability.